CONFLICT MANAGEMENT
Conflict handling is an important area in many different situations and
careers. From law enforcement, to personnel, human resources, management,
teaching, social work, counselling and many more.
CONFLICT HANDLING TECHNIQUESIn many conflict situations we can
choose how to behave and how to respond. It is well worth reflecting on
some of the most common ways of handling conflict because this will
increase our awareness of possible responses. It will also enable us to
check out our usual reactions and consider whether they are appropriate
for what we are trying to achieve in a particular situation.
There are
five main styles which can be adopted to handle conflict: competing,
soothing, avoiding, compromising, or joint problem solving.
Competing
is assertive and uncooperative. It involves an individual pursuing their
own concerns at another person's expense. This is a power oriented mode in
which one uses whatever power seems appropriate to win one's own position
- one's ability to argue, one's rank, or economic sanctions. Competing
might mean standing up for your rights, defending a position which you
believe is correct, or simply trying to win.
Soothing is unassertive
and cooperative; often tantamount to giving in. A soothing individual
attempts to preserve the relationship at all costs, emphasising areas of
agreement and failing to confront thorny issues.
Avoiding is
unassertive and uncooperative. The individual does not immediately pursue
his/her own concerns or those of the other person. He/she does not address
the conflict. Avoiding might take the form of diplomatically sidestepping
the issue, postponing the issue till a later/better time or simply
withdrawing from a threatening position.
Compromising is intermediate
between assertiveness and cooperativeness. The objective is to find
expedient, mutually acceptable solutions which partially satisfy both
parties, it falls in the middle ground between competing and
accommodating. It addresses issues more directly than avoiding, but it
doesn't explore it in as much depth as in joint problem solving.
Compromising might mean "splitting the difference", exchanging
concessions, or speaking a quick middle ground position.
Joint Problem
Solving is both assertive and cooperative - the opposite of avoiding. It
involves an attempt to work with the other person to find some mutually
satisfying solution. It means digging into an issue to identify the
underlying concerns of the two individuals and to find an alternative
which meets both sets of concerns. Joint problem solving might take the
form of exploring a disagreement, in order to learn from each other's
insights.
COURSE STRUCTUREThere are eight lessons in this course,
as follows:
1. Conflict Management and Anger
2.
Listening
3. Negotiation
4.
Mediation
5. Facilitation
6.
Balance of Power
7. Discussion and Group Work
8.
Crisis Analysis and Responses
AIMS
-
Describe the nature of human conflict and ways to manage it.
-
Explain the importance of listening when dealing with conflict
situations, and appreciate different listening techniques.
-
Define negotiation and discuss the process of negotiation
-
Define mediation and discuss the process of mediation
-
Define facilitation and discuss the process of facilitation
-
Discuss problems that may arise through negotiation, in particular,
balance of power and its connotations
-
Explain the importance of working in groups as a means of learning how
to deal with group conflicts
-
Explain ways of understanding and dealing with different types of
crisis.
WHAT YOU MAY DO IN THIS COURSEHere are just some of the things
you may cover:
-
Different types of conflict handling styles
-
Dealing with Anger
-
Controlling listening and Traps for listeners
-
Empathic listening
-
Negotiation between community and establishment
-
Practical suggestions for negotiation, breaking the rules, alternatives
-
Responsibilities of a mediator, mediation processes, agreements, team
work, settling behaviours
-
Factors influencing the balance of power
-
Role play
-
Conducting structured experiences in small groups
Conflict is destructive when it:
-
diverts energy away from important work or other issues (consider,
much scientific and social progress has been made during war times.
This is not to say that war is good, but that conflict can encourage
progressive thought and action)
-
destroys morale
-
polarises groups
-
deepens differences in values
-
produces violence
Conflict is constructive when it:
-
opens up and clarifies important issues and helps solve them
-
increases involvement of individuals in important issues
-
makes communication more authentic
-
releases pent-up emotion, stress or anxiety
-
helps build group cohesiveness
-
helps individual growth, provided there is reflection on the conflic
This course is available as a written correspondence course, as
downloadable modules and on CD.