32
100%
Reviews
Centre rating
Recommended
Have you studied here?
Architecture and Environment/Green Architecture
Vic
What I would highlight:
The quality of the lectures depends on the respective teacher. Partly very unstructured. Feedback on emails was late or not at all answered (this isn't beneficial for distance learning, at all!). Feedback on the submission tasks was OK and the support from staff was improved (slightly) during the studies, initially no reaction to e-mails
What could be improved:
.
Course taken:
December 2014
Would you recommend this course?:
Yes
Architecture and Environment/Green Architecture
Andreas
What I would highlight:
The correction of the submitted tasks takes too much time.
Quality of study materials is very good. Expertise of the teachers outstanding.
What could be improved:
.
Course taken:
December 2014
Would you recommend this course?:
Yes
Architecture and Environment/Green Architecture
Stefan
What I would highlight:
The program is optimally adapted to the current and future building trend. All lecturers are absolute experts in their field. The correction of the exams and the work, however, takes a long time and you have to wait an eternity for grades.
What could be improved:
.
Course taken:
December 2014
Would you recommend this course?:
Yes
Architecture and Environment/Green Architecture
K.
What I would highlight:
The study is a lot of fun and the contents are varied and comprehensible processed. The teachers come from very different areas and bring a lot of practical relevance. The literature could be a little better and the semester documents should go in addition to the lectures.
What could be improved:
.
Course taken:
December 2014
Would you recommend this course?:
Yes
Architecture and Environment/Green Architecture
Lena
What I would highlight:
I chose this master because of the sustainable approaches in its content and I'm still surprised how much this thinking can influence the planning decisions. Although, I feel the tuition fees are high especially those who want to a refresh in their professional.
What could be improved:
.
Course taken:
November 2014
Would you recommend this course?:
Yes
Architecture and Environment/Green Architecture
Jürgen
What I would highlight:
Top advice and service of the institute, high competence of the teachers, high quality & timeliness of study materials. Extensive correction of the submission tasks though.
What could be improved:
.
Course taken:
November 2014
Would you recommend this course?:
Yes
Architecture and Environment/Green Architecture
Friederike
What I would highlight:
The topics were very interesting and instructive. The attendance events were also well structured. The group work with the other students is a challenge, but it always worked out somehow.
What could be improved:
.
Course taken:
October 2014
Would you recommend this course?:
Yes
Architecture and Environment/Green Architecture
Laura
What I would highlight:
The study is well organized on the whole. This concerns both the documents and the presence events. The learning effect for architects in the first two semesters, however, is sometimes rather low, since here all the different disciplines are first brought to a level. The waiting times for grades are sometimes quite long. All in all, a good Masters course.
What could be improved:
.
Course taken:
October 2014
Would you recommend this course?:
Yes
Architecture and Environment/Green Architecture
Johanan
What I would highlight:
Good accessibility, good support, interesting and varied contents, choice of the deepening in the 3rd semester, very good organization at the presences, places of study all over Germany, interesting and interested lecturers.
What could be improved:
.
Course taken:
December 2013
Would you recommend this course?:
Yes
Architecture and Environment/Green Architecture
Andreas
What I would highlight:
As a civil engineer, it was important to me to learn in this area. This worked out great. Especially these well-proven lecturers were very good. I can only recommend anyone who is interested in architecture and the environment, at least to think about it.
What could be improved:
.
Course taken:
November 2013
Would you recommend this course?:
Yes
Architecture and Environment/Green Architecture
Johanna
What I would highlight:
Many different (sustainable and ecological) topics that are not primarily related to the course. It was good to have excellent German speaking lectures. Sometimes, corrections take a little longer for chores and exams.
What could be improved:
.
Course taken:
October 2013
Would you recommend this course?:
Yes
Architecture and Environment/Green Architecture
Tom
What I would highlight:
Teacher competence and personal contact are very good and pleasant. Individual contacts always possible - here nothing is impersonal. Also, there is always understanding and assistance with / for scheduling problems if you have any professional or private reasons. Unfortunately, there is often a lack of regular and timely feedback from reviews of submitted papers. Corrections of the submissions practically barely or only orally.
Presence appointments often made too late - which makes it difficult to organize the most employed. Overall, good but still quickly improved.
What could be improved:
.
Course taken:
October 2013
Would you recommend this course?:
Yes